Good Practices for authors during the Review Process

A discussion with Prof. Bernardo Innocenti where ask the following question. What are the most common reason of revision? What do reviewers look a first? How to deal with conflicting views between reviews? How to make the best out of the review process? What are the key elements to a good response? What to do with off-topic or irrelevant comments? How are reviewers selected? What is the role of the editor in the review process? What are open reviews? Are these types of practices the future of reviews?

1. Formal training with Françoise Vandooren.

The peer-review process & Open Peer Review

2. A discussion with Prof. Bernardo Innocenti

• What are the most common sources of revision?

• What do reviewers look a first?

• How to deal with conflicting views between reviews?

• How to make the best out of the review process?

• What are the key elements to a good response?

• What to do with off-topic or irrelevant comments?

• How are reviewers selected?

• What is the role of the editor in the review process?

• What are open reviews? Are these types of practices the future of reviews?